A mi me ha salido:
Staying Alive: Post-Mortem
Congratulations! You have survived!
You chose:
Round 1: I'll take a chance with the spacecraft
Round 2: I'll take the silicon, thanks
Round 3: Freeze me now
However, although you have survived, you seem to have taken an unnecessary risk.
There are basically three kinds of things that could be required for the continued existence of your self. One is bodily continuity, which may actually require only that parts of the body stay in existence (i.e., the brain). Another is psychological continuity, which requires the continuance of your consciousness - by which is meant your thoughts, ideas, memories, plans, beliefs, and so on. The third possibility is the continued existence of some kind of immaterial part of you, which might be called the soul. Of course, it may be the case that a combination of one or more types of these continuity is required for you to survive.
Your choices are consistent with the theory known as psychological reductionism. On this view, all that is required for the continued existence of the self is psychological continuity. Your three choices show that this is what you see as central to your sense of self, not any attachment to a particular substance, be it your body, brain or soul.
But there is a tension. In allowing your brain and body to be replaced by synthetic parts, you seemed to be accepting that psychological continuity is what matters, not bodily continuity. But if this is the case, why did you risk the spacecraft instead of taking the teletransporter? You ended up allowing your body to be replaced anyway, so why did you decide to risk everything on the spacecraft instead of just giving up your original body there and then?
Note: The chart above shows the percentage of people who have surivived and died playing this game.
Deja que pensar esta actividad, muchas gracias por traerla Edward.
Mostrar ContenidoSpoiler:
Staying Alive: Post-Mortem
Congratulations! You have survived!
You chose:
Round 1: I'll take a chance with the spacecraft
Round 2: I'll take the silicon, thanks
Round 3: Freeze me now
However, although you have survived, you seem to have taken an unnecessary risk.
There are basically three kinds of things that could be required for the continued existence of your self. One is bodily continuity, which may actually require only that parts of the body stay in existence (i.e., the brain). Another is psychological continuity, which requires the continuance of your consciousness - by which is meant your thoughts, ideas, memories, plans, beliefs, and so on. The third possibility is the continued existence of some kind of immaterial part of you, which might be called the soul. Of course, it may be the case that a combination of one or more types of these continuity is required for you to survive.
Your choices are consistent with the theory known as psychological reductionism. On this view, all that is required for the continued existence of the self is psychological continuity. Your three choices show that this is what you see as central to your sense of self, not any attachment to a particular substance, be it your body, brain or soul.
But there is a tension. In allowing your brain and body to be replaced by synthetic parts, you seemed to be accepting that psychological continuity is what matters, not bodily continuity. But if this is the case, why did you risk the spacecraft instead of taking the teletransporter? You ended up allowing your body to be replaced anyway, so why did you decide to risk everything on the spacecraft instead of just giving up your original body there and then?
Note: The chart above shows the percentage of people who have surivived and died playing this game.
Deja que pensar esta actividad, muchas gracias por traerla Edward.